The Australian National University
Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research
ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences
-A +A
Syndicate content
Robert Levitus

The allocation and management of royalties under the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act: Options for reform

Jon Altman and Robert Levitus

Discussion Paper 191 / 1999

Abstract:

In response to post-war mining developments on Northern Territory Aboriginal reserves, policy innovations established the principles that a special rate of royalties could be levied on those developments and applied to the benefit of Northern Territory Aborigines, and that a proportion of those royalties should be reserved for the people of the area where mining was taking place. The Woodward Land Rights Commission accepted these two principles and also created Aboriginal land councils as a third class of beneficiary.


Regionalisation of Northern Territory Land Councils

Robert Levitus, David Martin, and David Pollack

Discussion Paper 192 / 1999

Abstract:

The dispersal of the powers exercised and functions performed by the two major land councils has been the subject of debate and recommendations on a number of occasions since the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 came into effect. The Reeves Review of the Act in 1998, and the subsequent Inquiry into that Review by the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (HORSCATSIA) this year, have raised the issue to prominence again and ensured that it will be dealt with in the coming round of statutory amendments.


Policy issues for the Community Development Employment Projects scheme in rural and remote Australia

Jon Altman, Matthew Gray, and Robert Levitus

Discussion Paper 271 / 2005

Abstract:

One of the most important programs for Indigenous community and economic development is the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme. CDEP employs around 35,000 Indigenous Australians and accounts for over one-quarter of total Indigenous employment. This paper reviews the evidence on the social and economic impacts of the scheme. The available evidence demonstrates that the scheme does have positive economic and community development impacts and that it is cost effective in achieving these outcomes.